The most common winning defenses against restraining orders, based on our actual experience with clients and according to New Hampshire case decisions, are:
In New Hampshire, our laws don't use the terms "larceny," "embezzlement" and "false pretenses," but the theft laws cover all of those categories. For example, Massachusetts has many offenses that are designated as "larceny," which mirror similar offenses that we call "theft" in New Hampshire.
No. The Definitions Section of the New Hampshire law has a very expansive definition of property: "anything of value," that is "property of another," and which does not have to be a thing, as it can be "tangible or intangible."
The Definitions Section of the New Hampshire law on theft casts a wide net so as to include property that the accused has a partial ownership in. Thus, if two people live together and bought a flat screen TV together, and then one moves out and takes it with her without the other's permission, that could potentially be charged as a theft.
First of all, to us, all criminal prosecutions are serious — a serious threat to our client's reputation, livelihood, and even their freedom — regardless of whether charged as a felony or misdemeanor, and regardless of whether our client says she is guilty or not guilty. That being said, we have handled many significant New Hampshire felony cases involving theft and/or embezzlement from private business and nonprofit organizations, including cases in New Hampshire Superior Courts, and in the United States District Court for NH (federal court).
New Hampshire law allows the police and prosecutor to aggregate - add together - the value of multiple items or things of value taken in a single "scheme or course of conduct." NH RSA 637:2,, V(a). This is true even if there are multiple victims — that is, if the property was taken from a number of different individuals or businesses. Whether a series of criminal acts falls within a single "scheme or course of conduct" will be determined based on the accused's mental intent, which is a question for the judge or jury deciding the case. State v. Sampson, 120 N.H. 251 (1980).
Most DWI first offenders in NH do not face potential jail time. If your first offense DWI is an Aggravated DWI, or a Felony DWI, then jail time is mandatory — if you are convicted. Read more about NH DWI Penalties.
For decades, NH, unlike many other States, has not allowed drivers convicted of DWI to drive on a restricted license or an interlock. No "Cinderella" licenses, no "work permit" licenses, no "medical hardship" licenses, etc. However, effective January 1, 2016, a new law will allow some people convicted of DWI as a first offense to apply to a Court for a restricted license, after first serving 45 days of the suspension. Read more about the new law.
Unlike our neighbor, Massachusetts, NH law does not allow even a first offense DWI to be continued without a finding. However, our attorneys frequently obtain an even better outcome, a reduced charge such as Reckless Operation that is not a crime like DWI, and is not an alcohol-related conviction. Read more about our DWI Victories.
It might, if your case involves breath test evidence. The issue only affects breath tests conducted on the Intoxilyzer 5000EN, the large machine at the police department. It does not necessarily affect portable breath tests administered at the scene of the motor vehicle stop or accident investigation. Read more about this issue with the Intoxilyzer 5000EN.
The NH Forensic Laboratory has been backlogged for years and sometimes takes as long as six weeks to report the results of blood tests in DWI cases. However, you should not wait until you get the results — you should consult with a lawyer now. In some cases, we have saved clients from mandatory jail time by acting quickly in blood test cases.
In popular culture, every time a police officer makes an arrest, the officer immediately reads the defendant his "Miranda rights" - you have the right to remain silent, everything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law, you have the right to an attorney, if you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you upon request.
However, neither the Federal Constitution, nor the New Hampshire Constitution, requires police officers to routinely read these rights immediately upon arrest. Rather, officers must only ask these questions, after arrest, if the officer intends to engage in "custodial interrogation" - questioning of the defendant, or comments intended to elicit an incriminating response, while the defendant is in custody.
Up until the point of arrest, in the typical case where there is a motor vehicle stop and roadside investigation, the officer can ask questions, including questions that are designed to get the driver to incriminate herself like "how much have you had to drink tonight?", without reading Miranda rights.
If the officer interrogates a person who is in custody, without reading Miranda rights, the typical remedy is to "suppress" (eliminate from evidence at trial) the defendant's incriminating statements, and also, potentially, suppress any evidence obtained as a fruit of those statements. Suppression of evidence, not outright dismissal of the case, is the remedy.
We don't know the numbers for the entire system, but we do know that many of our clients are not convicted of DWI. Read more here.
We work with many clients who come to NH on business, or on vacation, or to visit family, a second home, etc. In particular, we have worked with many clients who have driver's licenses from Vermont, Massachusetts, Maine, Connecticut, and New York. Based on these experiences, and based on our close connections with lawyers in these States, we can accurately advise you as to the impact that different potential case outcomes will have on your home State license. For other States, we will take affirmative steps to make sure that our clients are provided accurate and timely information about their local laws, procedures, and administrative consequences. Every State is different. If a lawyer that you consult with simply tells you, if you get suspended in NH, you will be suspended in your home State as well — they are probably wrong. It's much more complicated than that.
NH law does not provide for a jury trial for those charged with DWI as a first offense. If you are charged with Aggravated DWI, or Subsequent Offense DWI, or Felony DWI, you do have the right to a jury trial.
The DWI / DUI defense lawyers at Lothstein Guerriero, PLLC do not have any "set pricing" or "one size fits all" policies. We treat every case as a unique case, we focus on each client's unique needs, and the fees we charge will depend on the specific circumstances of the case. That being said, we charge "flat fees" in all DWI cases, except for certain felony DWIs. A "flat fee" means that you pay one fee to the firm and it covers the defense of the court case, defense of the administrative license suspension hearing, and if you do lose your license, even if you are not convicted of DWI, our staff continues to work with you until your license or operating privilege is restored. With flat fees, you don't have to worry about "how much is this phone call costing me," "will my lawyer's guess as to how much this cost me turn out to be accurate," and other such worries associated with the hourly fees charged by many lawyers in NH.
© 2021 Lothstein Guerriero, PLLC